RALPH
Just as I prophesied: a cop-out. Dave, you admit you are "very
poorly informed" as to the contents of the official "inerrant"
Bible. >>
(DAVE 5/22) Ralph: Did I admit I didn't know the "contents"
of the Bible? Hmmmm, please show me where. >>
DAR
How soon Dave forgets. When it is convenient:
Dave< "I am very poorly informed on the process of
canonization,..."
"I acknowledge that there is dispute as to what should and
should not be "included" in the Bible..."
DAVE
I "admitted" not having a good grasp on the process of
canonization.
DAR
Typical Dave quibble. The "process of canonization" is the act
of determining the "contents" of the Bible.
RALPH
So please explain to us why you have spent these many months
past trying to defend (or dodge) the alleged "inerrancy" of a book
you admit you don't even know the contents of? >>
DAR
Yes.
And if Dave would like to pretend that he DOES know
the correct contents of the one true inspired Bible (implied by his
comment: "Did I admit I didn't know the "contents" of the Bible?
Hmmmm, please show me where."). Perhaps he could share with
us how he knows this.
As Ralph has asked him repeatedly.
cheers,
Darrel
---------------------
"It's always difficult to defend that which is not truth." --Magill 3/12